Biostar A68N-5600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5600  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 20:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 80
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 115
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7620G
Biostar(1565 1708) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 4.31
3% 3.91 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 3.91
3% 3.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SC032G 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 110 112 127 124 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 120
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
4% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5600 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback