Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 48.7 1-Core 49.7 2-Core 99.4 39% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 817GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 301 299 297 290 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 399 Write 399 Mixed 310 SusWrite 296 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 36.7 129% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 215 161% 215 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	324x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	127x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	52x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	32x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	21x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	15x

RAM
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	62x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	60x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	52x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16