Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121026
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 148 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 432 45% 361 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 27.8 27% 28.4 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 33.6 Splatting 32.4 28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 333 310 255 263 258 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 257 Write 366 Mixed 265 SusWrite 264 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 35.3 114% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.1 DQ Write 69 DQ Mixed 46 37% 50 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 134%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 59GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 107 102 107 108 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 388 Write 108 Mixed 156 SusWrite 100 41% 188 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 14.7 86% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 15.5 23% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 65%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 873GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 94 94 96 96 94 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 86.5 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 91 62% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	185x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	81x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	57x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	45x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16