HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8760w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1630
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 18:40
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 392
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-180 180GB
134GB free
Firmware: 10B
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 250
Write 237
Mixed 200
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 22.2
82% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 123
106% 157 MB/s
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 84.8
Mixed 45.5
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
AS Mass Storage 32GB
10GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 1
2% 1.33 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback