Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 131 2-Core 197 82% 139 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 496 68% 503 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16% Very poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 78 0% 47.5 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 58.6 Splatting 52 47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20 12,702 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 215 19 70 10 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 483 Write 357 Mixed 328 SusWrite 118 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 27.4 141% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 99.8 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 38 78% 151 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 23.2 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 23.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	42x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16