Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L655  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101231
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 57
2-Core 113
48% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 132
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD50) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 50 44 44 35 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 49.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 42.9
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
60% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback