Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 244 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 347 47% 350 Pts	64-Core 703 44% 703 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 90%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 779 552 568 567 597 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,289 Write 1,267 Mixed 594 SusWrite 787 272% 1,234 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 73 228% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 626 DQ Write 801 DQ Mixed 748 555% 725 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 306%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB 1,927 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.9% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 11.8 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	441x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	194x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	162x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	95x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	86x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	83x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	252x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	88x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GBMicronBench 88%, 2,294 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16