Cyberpowerpc TRACER Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCyberpowerpc TRACER Series  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL NFSV150x
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160401
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 476
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
Device(1D05 1019) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 32.7
30% 35.3 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 25.9
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 647 688 723 730 622 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 744
Mixed 618
SusWrite 665
163% 726 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 37
132% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 329
247% 327 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 131%
Great: 445%
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
33GB free
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 304 301 195 251 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 457
Write 354
Mixed 252
SusWrite 245
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 27.1
95% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 200
177% 266 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 104%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 96 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 93
Write 83.8
Mixed 61
SusWrite 94.9
112% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBSFU240B02 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRACER Series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Cyberpowerpc TRACER Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback