Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 09:28
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 131 65% 103 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 507 49% 403 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 71.1 Reflection 80.5 Parallax 108 58% 86.5 fps	MRender 83.2 Gravity 88.3 Splatting 67 64% 79.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 297 296 298 298 297 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 460 Mixed 411 SusWrite 316 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 60.3 203% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 264 198% 265 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 343GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1132 619 622 621 621 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,413 Write 1,188 Mixed 1,174 SusWrite 800 256% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 70.7 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 95.8 327% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 906 DQ Write 799 DQ Mixed 843 634% 849 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 340%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44 9,759 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 73GB free Firmware: GM2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 81 80 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 80.5 Write 78.7 Mixed 47 SusWrite 80.1 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 10,715 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 20.1 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 14.6 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	11x
GP-ASM2NE2256GTTDR 256GBGigabyteBench 158%, 4,456 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 445 samples	7x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $303

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16