Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191125
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 04:33
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 69.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 240 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 813 74% 624 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.2% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 116 Parallax 114 92% 114 fps	MRender 163 Gravity 113 Splatting 95.7 98% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 70GB free Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 200 54 52 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 306 Write 197 Mixed 240 SusWrite 108 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 29.6 122% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 140 120% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 71 78 84 90 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 23.7 Write 34.5 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 77.1 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 22,404 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.6 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 24.8 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	79x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	64x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	34x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $41Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $641

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16