Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 16:48
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 95.2 43% 69 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 136 19% 139 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E166) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.34% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 6.09 6% 7.52 fps	MRender 8.24 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 9.48 6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.34% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 95 65 92 153 155 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 164 Write 54.5 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 115 22% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 8.5 27% 8.17 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 14.3 13% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 8GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 20 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 21.3 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 19 29% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.7 157% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.6% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16