Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4-F (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 16:18
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 723 75% 604 Pts	64-Core 992 61% 992 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 108 265% 108 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 143 141 144 154 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 455 Write 390 Mixed 311 SusWrite 162 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 15.8 77% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 32.4 44% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 55%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 390GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 489 489 487 489 489 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 486 Mixed 418 SusWrite 487 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 47.8 166% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 367 276% 368 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB 2,876 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 36.6 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 42.2 SC Mixed 31.9 97% 33.9 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	425x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	371x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $155Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	98x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	128x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	120x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	118x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	63x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	109x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	93x
3200 C16 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 42,084 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $362

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16