Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X3 710 965 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 70.5 43% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 91.4 8-Core 88.2 12% 89.8 Pts	64-Core 88.4 6% 88.4 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D8) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30% Below average	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 32.2 31% 32.1 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 34.6 Splatting 33.6 29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA17.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 101 98 74 112 79 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 187 Write 141 Mixed 138 SusWrite 86.9 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 24.9 93% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 33.4 DQ Mixed 32 24% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Phenom II X2 550AMDBench 46%, 3,836 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3300ATIBench 1%, 913 samples	1x

RAM
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16