PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180803 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '20 at 09:41 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 383 386 389 377 396 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
799GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 269 271 268 265 276 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
330GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 129 127 123 130 MB/s
|
74.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 121 124 123 129 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
36GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 122 126 119 121 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Kingston DT2000 32GB
26GB free, PID 16af
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
4GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 17 16 17 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2934 MHz
|
47%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 179x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 133x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 121x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 81x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 68x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $1,131 |