Emachines ET1331G

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Emachines ET1331G (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines MCP61PM-GM
Memory	3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 02:40
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 35.1 2-Core 70.6 38% 57.8 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 141 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% EVGA(3842 3733) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.96% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 9.12 7% 8.51 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.04 7% 8.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD 423 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 172 181 106 67 66 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 225 Write 151 Mixed 151 SusWrite 122 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 20.8 85% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 28.3 24% 33 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 86%
Maxtor 6 L100M0 100GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 62GB free Firmware: BANC SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 57 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 52 Write 58.1 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 56 37% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 355GB free Firmware: GG2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 87 87 90 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 94.7 Write 92.3 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 86 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 58%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	4.58% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.2 8% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.58% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 400, 400, 400, 400 MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.1 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET1331G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1331G

CPU
Athlon II X2 250uAMDBench 33%, 495 samples	1x
Athlon II X2 235eAMDBench 42%, 675 samples	1x
Athlon II X2 270AMD $20Bench 43%, 6,369 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	1x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	1x

SSD
50 240GBFcct240mBench 67%, 16 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBKingstonBench 23%, 701 samples	1x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1x
Kingston 6GBUnknownBench 29%, 27 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16