Asus K52Je

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K52Je  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Je
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 20:52
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 121
52% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.840.0.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 104 104 113 110 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.6% Poor
Read 109
Write 88.2
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 100
21% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 10.2
40% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 24.2
DQ Mixed 19.2
16% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52Je Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Je

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback