Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5625

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E5625  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2724-A1
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
Socket AM2+, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 75.1
38% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 75.4
8-Core 75.5
10% 75.4 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 334.89
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.83
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 33 35 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 33.8
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35
55GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 33.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 67.8
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%
Kingston DT 101 II 8GB
1GB free, PID 1613
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.5 7.7 8.6 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 7.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 8.3
11% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E5625 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5625

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback