Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4E-S05CL
Memory	0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 26 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 76.6 1-Core 61.9 2-Core 102 51% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 151 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8600/8700M 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sanyo(144D C708) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15029.20013 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Lighting 7.77 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 9.25 6% 8.31 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 8.26 6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 232 246 249 255 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 406 Write 251 Mixed 264 SusWrite 246 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 25.9 85% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 189 153% 215 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 123%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 197GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 93 96 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 90 Mixed 52 SusWrite 93.7 61% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 6GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	76x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	188x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16