Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 199 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 426 44% 357 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 2B3E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.35% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 7.03 6% 7.63 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 6.27 Splatting 14.7 8% 8.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.35% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,599 Write 750 Mixed 643 218% 998 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 63.4 215% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 792 DQ Mixed 717 572% 800 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 836GB free Firmware: AX1R4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 104 104 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 102 62% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6700TIntelBench 70%, 9,225 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
Trion 100 240GBOCZ $95Bench 67%, 9,561 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	1x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16