PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 8.09% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180716 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '20 at 14:32 |
Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
Run User | LBN-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.3 8.3 8.3 11 5.5 MB/s
|
8.09%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
110GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 277 275 214 32 32 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
520GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 83 84 84 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 37 40 40 MB/s
|
22.7%
Poor
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
381GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 94 94 94 93 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 78.D1GS7.AUB0B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 319x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 317x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 194x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 118x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $278 |