Asrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190625
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 26 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 150 59% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 524 48% 402 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 15.6 13% 15.1 fps	MRender 16.7 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 15.2 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 470GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 429 436 450 429 418 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 392 Write 353 Mixed 378 SusWrite 419 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 32.7 112% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 349 261% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 133%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 459GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 119 119 117 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 124 Write 114 Mixed 69 SusWrite 119 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB 4,229 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.1% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 26.4 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	8x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	8x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	4x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	3x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16