Asus M3A79-T DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3A79-T DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090428
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 07:32
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9950
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 69.9
42% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 145
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 7.38
Parallax 2.72
5% 5.55 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.91
4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 43 48 62 61 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 146
Write 122
Mixed 142
SusWrite 48.5
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 15
47% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 26.5
24% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 134%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
6GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 56 50 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 58
Mixed 46
SusWrite 55.1
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 65%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
234GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 83 81 90 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 86.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 87
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.4 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 7.5
16% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.3
86% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 1.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A79-T DELUXE Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A79-T DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback