Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 03:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 110
56% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 403
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23
Parallax 84.5
16% 42.5 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 54.9
51% 63 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 4.1 128 4 117 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 366
Write 263
Mixed 187
SusWrite 63.2
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.2
4% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
42GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 48 49 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 373
Write 360
Mixed 297
SusWrite 87
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 43.8
37% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
97GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 360 365 369 374 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 398
Write 374
Mixed 317
SusWrite 361
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 35.2
116% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 44.9
38% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback