Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 02:54
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 907
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3655 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 138
Parallax 160
167% 168 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 127
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 138%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 442 452 453 445 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 313
Mixed 309
SusWrite 429
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 45.8
156% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 227
204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
172GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 464 419 344 345 345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 460
Mixed 424
SusWrite 394
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 55.3
177% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
786GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 1974 1978 1985 1943 1778 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,270
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,417
SusWrite 1,940
416% 1,854 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.4
253% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 477
484% 784 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 330%
Great: 372%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 33 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 150
Write 39.1
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 24.9
75% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.4
219% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 171
Write 120
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 104
155% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
166% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $971
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback