| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H97M-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160328 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 26 '20 at 00:01 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
65.4%
Good
|
65% 102 Pts
|
30% 227 Pts
|
14% 223 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
18% 19.9 fps
|
17% 21.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20E1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 639 287 218 223 222 MB/s
|
137%
Outstanding
|
113% 502 MB/s
|
208% 73.9 MB/s
|
475% 634 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 129 130 131 MB/s
|
74.4%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
189% 1.4 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 159 162 161 162 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.5%
Above average
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
63% 63.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,528 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 582x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 388x |
| Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 304x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 199x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 192x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 159x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $277 |