| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190718 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '20 at 23:14 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
71% 126 Pts
|
52% 420 Pts
|
35% 570 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.9%
Above average
|
61% 71.7 fps
|
49% 61.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 48 36 33 32 45 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
24% 105 MB/s
|
46% 19.3 MB/s
|
28% 49.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
300GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 139 143 150 149 MB/s
|
76.1%
Very good
|
83% 113 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
40.5%
Average
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
40% 99 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,800 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 264x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 196x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 123x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 126x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 110x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $308 |