Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '20 at 23:02
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 96 2-Core 192 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 518 52% 425 Pts	64-Core 1,239 77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.2% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 34.5 25% 35 fps	MRender 43.9 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 35.2 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 429 435 425 426 417 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 431 Mixed 316 SusWrite 430 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 35.6 119% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 336 257% 349 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 118%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 439GB free Firmware: AV002D SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 127 128 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 126 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 4x4GB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.6% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 20.4 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	136x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16