Lenovo 20AWA1TULM

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 55%
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20AWA1TULM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWA1TULM
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 77
8-Core 260
19% 168 Pts
64-Core 482
32% 482 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 24.1
4% 19.1 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 20.6
3% 16.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 94 74 40 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 354
Write 250
Mixed 262
SusWrite 76.6
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 25.2
87% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 99.5
83% 120 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 20AWA1TULM Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 51%
Workstation 21%

System: Lenovo 20AWA1TULM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $292
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback