Asus X705UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X705UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705UAR
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '20 at 20:34
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 118 41% 259 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D70) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 7.78 5% 6.75 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 13 8% 9.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 166 175 155 132 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 464 Write 411 Mixed 269 SusWrite 167 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 36.1 123% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 237 204% 303 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 92%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 124 126 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 140 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 126 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705UAR Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	47x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	26x
Pentium 4417UIntelBench 48%, 2,782 samples	26x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	83x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	26x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	24x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	15x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	32x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16