Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 70.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 258 82% 153 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 984 89% 746 Pts	64-Core 1,719 106% 1,719 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000 805 User benchmarks, average bench 120% HP(103C 11A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 172 Parallax 168 113% 160 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 173 Splatting 110 106% 131 fps
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 128%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1009 572 593 581 602 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 2,020 Write 1,311 Mixed 1,148 SusWrite 794 293% 1,318 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 37.7 141% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,060 DQ Write 68.2 DQ Mixed 131 204% 420 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 284%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 410GB free Firmware: M0CR050 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 371 356 351 346 369 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 380 Write 341 Mixed 306 SusWrite 364 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 17.8 67% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 101 100% 169 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 105%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB 5,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 122 126 122 122 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 62.8 Write 116 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 120 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 4x16GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 51.4 MC Mixed 34.5 115% 40.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 10.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 141%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	366x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	342x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	326x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	271x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	89x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	86x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16