Fujitsu CELSIUS H720

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS H720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB257
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 188 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 427 49% 381 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 175E) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2525 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.61% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.94 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.61% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB 2,222 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0807A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 35 23 41 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 457 Write 116 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 53.3 35% 163 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 1.2 50% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 5.2 25% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$79 2,695 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 147GB free Firmware: PC2OCA0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 68 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 73.9 Write 75.6 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 67.1 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.9 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS H720 Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H720

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	43x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	7x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	47x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	25x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	4x

SSD
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 2,791 samples	10x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 51%, 8,416 samples	8x
HMT41GS6MFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 61 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16