Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 111
52% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 284
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 67.2
57% 68.7 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 66.4
54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1211 480GB SSD 754D117-533
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS121101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 342 369 379 381 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 378
Write 353
Mixed 267
SusWrite 363
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.1
95% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 184
149% 210 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
964GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 79 80 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 91.6
Write 92.2
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 79.2
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
159GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 70 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 73.6
Mixed 40
SusWrite 68.4
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
293GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 66 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 74.7
Write 75
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 66.6
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
124GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 55 55 58 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 79.3
Write 73.4
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 56.8
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
576GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 76 64 68 67 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 93.2
Write 39
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 69.3
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
79GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 37
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 38.3
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 119 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 132
Write 120
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 118
150% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.4
258% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 118 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 118
169% 128 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
116% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback