Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 107 51% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 279 28% 228 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6152) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 27.1 24% 26.5 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 29 Splatting 28.5 24% 30 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 58 10 42 35 15 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.1% Very poor	Read 140 Write 69.5 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 39 17% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 8.9 35% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 8.2 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 10.1 8% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.9 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	24x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16