Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UF
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 243
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1A1E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.3
11% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 8.96
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 344 377 257 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 343
Write 406
Mixed 317
SusWrite 271
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 28.5
96% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 305
219% 279 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
917GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 105
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
86GB free, PID a102
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 39 38 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 29.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 37.6
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback