Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 34.7 1-Core 15.3 2-Core 36.4 19% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 143 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 82EE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4526 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 1.41 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 3.91 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB 8,741 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 109 107 110 107 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 326 Write 232 Mixed 183 SusWrite 105 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 14.5 43% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 111 97% 146 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4BDG1646Q-HYKO 2x2GB 1,004 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 9.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.6 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 229 18% 229 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	98x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	76x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	15x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	97x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	68x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	16x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	77x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	53x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	30x

RAM
K4BDG1646Q-HYKO 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 1,004 samples	143x
H5TC4G63CFR-PBA 2x2GBHynixBench 25%, 295 samples	23x
HMT851S6CMR6A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 27%, 219 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16