Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 151 58% 100 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 469 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 538 33% 538 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS512G32MND-3210A 512GB 1,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20400P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 316 269 281 234 241 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 248 Write 301 Mixed 266 SusWrite 267 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 18.9 64% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 289 224% 306 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 707GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 174 182 181 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 162 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 176 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 12 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

SSD
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	91x
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	75x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	29x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	341x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	165x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	97x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16