PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2912-A1 |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100429 |
Uptime | 10.1 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '20 at 11:42 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3CF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 38 57 78 98 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
125GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 50 56 56 56 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
261GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ST950032 5AS 500GB
125GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
8.07%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 21x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 9x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $129 |