| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ |
| Memory | 174.3 GB free of 192 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20150304 |
| Uptime | 9.7 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '20 at 09:37 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
62.1%
Good
|
53% 93.9 Pts
|
58% 482 Pts
|
118% 1,914 Pts
|
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 477 477 475 469 473 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
98% 435 MB/s
|
133% 49.9 MB/s
|
231% 330 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2K70DM0-CF8 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
44.5%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
23% 7.9 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 7x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 5x |
| CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 7x |
| RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 4x |
| GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 3x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 7x |
| 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples | 3x |
| 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $234Bench 290%, 10,709 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $184 |