Packard dot s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPackard dot s  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJE06_PT
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 08:14
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 6.9
2-Core 13.8
18% 21.7 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 22.7
3% 22 Pts
64-Core 22.6
1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.74.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 53 103 51 73 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 136
Write 78.5
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 75.4
20% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 7.5
27% 8.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 14.7
12% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4D34373142353737334348532D43483920 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
9.83% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback