Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 05:52
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 821
76% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,824
113% 1,824 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 143
Parallax 154
122% 149 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 128
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 862 663 639 663 653 651 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2447
Write 2,270
Mixed 1,760
SusWrite 689
400% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 76.2
249% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 796
573% 744 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 250%
Great: 355%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
692GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 43 40 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 93.5
Write 68
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 41.2
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 61%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 66 65 76 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 83.8
Write 77
Mixed 52
SusWrite 72.3
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 100%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
525GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 33 35 34 34 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.2
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 100
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,117
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback