Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705FD
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 02:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 464
54% 419 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1431) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 19.3
17% 20.5 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 19.8
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 796 538 544 544 548 550 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,368
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,308
SusWrite 586
320% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 101
325% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 931
689% 912 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 273%
Great: 144%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
733GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 117 108 111 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 80.3
Write 82.5
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 111
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback