Asus M2N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M2N  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090216
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 00:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 35.5
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 36.1
21% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 38.2
5% 40 Pts
64-Core 43.3
3% 43.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.38
7% 5.89 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer A S350 256GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 140 135 137 139 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 161
Write 124
Mixed 121
SusWrite 130
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.4
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 29.1
28% 44 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback