MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 23:59
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 291
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 872
91% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 147
Parallax 160
123% 153 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 110
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 419 426 425 430 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,560
Mixed 1,272
SusWrite 490
271% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 66.9
255% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 1034
DQ Mixed 997
782% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 218%
Great: 237%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 329 366 369 371 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 367
Write 368
Mixed 314
SusWrite 350
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 42.3
140% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 121%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
20GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 60 65 67 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 466
Write 128
Mixed 128
SusWrite 64.8
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 19.3
100% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 44
56% 104 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 73%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 429 428 427 431 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 424
Mixed 377
SusWrite 429
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 47.4
150% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 185
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$46
783GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 161 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 156
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 162
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.6
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 30.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $900
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback