| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170901 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | May 24 '20 at 19:02 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.2%
Good
|
65% 115 Pts
|
55% 458 Pts
|
53% 858 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.3%
Average
|
48% 58.8 fps
|
47% 56 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 116 12 142 17 14 MB/s
|
50.5%
Above average
|
49% 220 MB/s
|
76% 28.1 MB/s
|
73% 162 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
97GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 414 440 448 337 134 MB/s
|
95.2%
Outstanding
|
90% 400 MB/s
|
124% 41.4 MB/s
|
272% 364 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
324GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 56 56 56 MB/s
|
31.5%
Below average
|
39% 53 MB/s
|
114% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.5%
Above average
|
62% 21.6 GB/s
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
38% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 96x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 69x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 67x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 57x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $871 |