Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 162% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	39.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 18:41
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Memory 70 1-Core 147 2-Core 286 89% 168 Pts	4-Core 587 8-Core 1,170 104% 879 Pts	64-Core 2,187 135% 2,187 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	155% Outstanding	Lighting 210 Reflection 224 Parallax 235 171% 223 fps	MRender 261 Gravity 213 Splatting 146 163% 207 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 341 409 406 437 436 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 494 Write 469 Mixed 316 SusWrite 389 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 28.5 114% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 185 150% 220 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 133%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 109GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 206 238 254 255 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 504 Write 258 Mixed 285 SusWrite 221 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 13.8 58% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 18.3 26% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 81%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 143 138 143 143 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 152 Write 166 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 139 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 1.6 361% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 48GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 27.9 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 25.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $918

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16