Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% J3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Memory 30.6 1-Core 11.6 2-Core 27 16% 23.1 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 27.3 4% 29.3 Pts	64-Core 32.8 2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 07.01D07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 31 33 22 19 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 27.3 Mixed 14 SusWrite 23.9 18% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 7GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 34 35 24 23 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 45.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 27.2 27% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.35% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.9 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 251 16% 251 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	5x
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	1x
Pentium D 3.20GHzIntel $100Bench 31%, 938 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $54

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16