Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 11:40
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$506 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 69.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 962 95% 776 Pts	64-Core 2,433 151% 2,433 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Nvidia(10DE 13A1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 171 Parallax 181 118% 166 fps	MRender 199 Gravity 151 Splatting 108 120% 153 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189 3,261 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 742GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1398 1402 1404 1413 1408 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 1,911 Write 2,272 Mixed 1,798 SusWrite 1,444 419% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 71.8 256% 97.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,203 DQ Write 1,066 DQ Mixed 1,135 851% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 191% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 337%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: SPS6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 115 125 124 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 129 Write 91.2 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 118 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 71%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 10.01E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 56.3 Write 55.7 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 54.4 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 142 142 141 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 138 Mixed 93.8 SusWrite 142 177% 134 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 0.6 504% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 369% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 105%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 60GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 116 117 116 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 118 Write 99.7 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 110 118% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 166%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 128GB free, PID 01ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 25.2 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 47GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 41.8 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 41.7 53% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 19%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60M2NA0 1TB 57GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 40 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 21.5 44% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 144% 1.8 MB/s

BUFFALO HD-NRLD-A 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free, PID 02c9 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 147 149 149 149 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 140 Write 149 Mixed 112 SusWrite 147 187% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 83%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 17GB free, PID 012e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 21 22 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 22.2 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 21.4 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB 1,561 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.7% Very good	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 29.3 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 24.5 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,911x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,339x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,102x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,102x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	878x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	610x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	706x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	432x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,732

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16