Microelectronics X601

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Microelectronics X601 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 06:04
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 28 2-Core 67.9 31% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 534 42% 373 Pts	64-Core 944 58% 944 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.2% Good	Lighting 52.4 Reflection 135 Parallax 167 43% 118 fps	MRender 164 Gravity 128 Splatting 99.3 103% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 660 656 663 657 657 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,825 Write 1,674 Mixed 1,227 SusWrite 666 301% 1,348 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 42.3 138% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 412 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 639 407% 465 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 340%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 141 144 144 145 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 138 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 141 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 30.7 84% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X601 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

System: Microelectronics X601

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	6x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	4x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	3x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	2x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	1x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	3x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBCorsairBench 43%, 8,400 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,056

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16