Microelectronics X601

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Microelectronics X601 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 05:56
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 26 2-Core 57.3 33% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 547 44% 383 Pts	64-Core 940 58% 940 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.9% Good	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 173 37% 96.1 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 136 Splatting 105 110% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 656 663 664 661 660 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1802 Write 1,644 Mixed 1,227 SusWrite 688 300% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 41.6 135% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 414 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 348 270% 370 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 340%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 145 144 145 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 160 Write 144 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 144 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 32.5 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.2 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X601 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

System: Microelectronics X601

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	6x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	4x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	3x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	2x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	1x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	3x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBCorsairBench 43%, 8,400 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,059

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16