Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 850
89% 715 Pts
64-Core 1085
67% 1085 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 63
Parallax 51.2
44% 56.2 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 71.2
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 149 169 107 132 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 680
Mixed 573
SusWrite 147
138% 624 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 55.6
200% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 387
345% 522 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 141%
Great: 144%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
285GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 448 444 441 452 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 465
Mixed 458
SusWrite 420
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 55.2
184% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
793GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 133 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 40
SusWrite 135
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
224GB free
Firmware: PB2OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 77.8
Write 78
Mixed 32
SusWrite 80.3
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
161GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 67.5
Write 67.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 67.6
78% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback